Mike's acaTunes Blog
Mike Mendyke is one of the Co-Founders of acaTunes and one heck of a guy. Mike likes to talk about DRM, why it sucks, and other fun things like that.
You can contact Mike using our Contact Form.
|
| |
| Report Shows: 3 out of 4 Customer Complaints Are Due To DRM | Mon March 19th, 2007 |
| One of the largest online music stores in Europe reports that 3 out of 4 customer complaints have their origins in problems with DRM:
Read the article
acaTunes promises to skip this purposeless and destructive technology, and let you, the consumer, decide how you're going to use the content you spend your good money to acquire.
We, and the Artists who distribute their content through acaTunes, thank you for your support.
| | Maybe this blog won't be very long, after all... | Thu February 15th, 2007 |
| If music industry execs don't like DRM, and customers don't like it, and musicians don't like it, who's left to appease?
http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?RSS&newsID=17229
| | P2P Has Negligible Effect on Music Sales? | Tue February 13th, 2007 |
| A study published in the German magazine Journal of Political Economy concludes that P2P sharing has no statistically significant effect on the sale of music:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070212-8813.html
Of course, statistics can be presented in a way to bolster nearly any claim. And there is more than one side to the story. Where 10,000 fewer sales may be "statistically insignificant" to one of the big music publishers, it may represent a large percentage of an indie band's music sales.
But I think the study missed the boat in another way: it doesn't address is the positive effect sharing has on grassroots building of a fan base, which I believe ultimately leads to more recognition and more sales.
I'm much more likely to become a fan of a group if a friend tells me about them; and once I am a fan, I'm more likely to buy their music. Makes sense to me... | | Even Steve Jobs agrees with us! | Tue February 6th, 2007 |
| It's awfully nice when a competitor admits publicly that their service is less costumer-friendly than ours. An acaTunes 'tip of the hat' to Steve Jobs, who recognizes that DRM-free music is the better choice for consumers:
http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/ | | Labels Moving Away From DRM? | Mon January 22nd, 2007 |
| Midem is an annual trade fair for the music industry, and there is growing interest in moving away from the bad business model of crippling music files with DRM:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/21/yourmoney/music.php/
Remember, acaTunes is a proud DRM-free establishment. Buy your tracks, download your tracks, and enjoy them from the comfort of whatever hardware you choose to use! | | Death of DRM | Mon January 8th, 2007 |
| Wired magazine has an article about the anticipated "death of DRM"
For those who dont' know, DRM stands for "Dumb Restrictions on Media".
OK, actually it stands for "Digital Rights Management", and is one of the worst ideas ever thought up by an industry desperate to hang onto its old business models. Read and enjoy.
| | acaTunes & RARB | Mon December 4th, 2006 |
| You may have noticed that some of our tracks have something called "RARB Scores", and that some albums have links to RARB Reviews.
For those of you new to the community, RARB is The Recorded A Cappella Review Board, and for over twelve years has been publishing reviews of a cappella albums. While everyone's tastes are (thankfully!) different, RARB provides a useful bass line (OK, I can say that with a straight face because I am a bass)...now where was I?
Anyway, we're grateful to the folks at RARB for kindly providing acaTunes with permission to collect and utilize their review data. We hope you find it useful, and that it will enhance your virtual window shopping of music.
So Groups: while you are busy sending us copies of all of your albums, old and new, your should be sending copies to RARB as well. Visit their web site for submission details. | | Digital Master Use Rights | Mon October 30th, 2006 |
| It bears repeating that there are two different licenses associated with online sale or distribution of digital media, DPD Licensing and Master Use Rights.
DPD Licensing is the one people think of first (when they think about licensing at all). DPD (Digital Permanent Download) is the virtual version of the mechanical license commonly found in meatspace.
When you record a song written by someone else, you need their permission in order to sell it. The compulsory license allows you to obtain permission automatically, in exchange for agreeing to pay a statutory fee for every copy of the song you sell. acaTunes, of course, provides a licensing service through special agreement with the Harry Fox Agency, making it easy to acquire DPD licenses for the large majority of cover songs.
Master Use Rights are those not associated with the original writing of the song, but of the actual recording itself; the 1's and 0's that, played in proper sequence over a music player, produce the sounds originally sung into a microphone and mixed, edited, and mastered into a final track for the listening pleasure of fans everywhere.
These Master Use Rights originate with the artists. If an album is part of a record deal, these rights might end up with the label or a publisher, but for most college and high school groups, the right remains with the group.
The key point about Master Use Rights is that, unlike mechanical or DPD rights, there is no compulsory license provision. In other words, no one can use your recordings without your permission!
You know those "Hits of the 70's (or 80's, 90's, etc)" compilations advertised on late-night television? For each and every song included, the publishers of the compilation had to go out, find the group, person, or label that controlled or represented the Master Use Rights of that song, and get permission to use it.
And here's the punch line: even if your group has given permission for someone to put your song on a physical compilation CD, you still retain authority over the Master Use Rights to distribute that song digitally. In fact, if someone is selling digital downloads of your recording without your permission, they are in violation of copyright law, and are effectively stealing income from you.
You are free, of course, to permit someone to sell your mp3s, at whatever rate and for whatever cut you can negotiate. But if you don't like the terms of the deal, you can take your mp3s and go home; it's not compulsory. Like the Hits
And even if you do decide to give permission, you should be compensated for sales of your mp3. I believe that groups' rights should be respected, and their work properly compensated. That's why you'll often see tracks on acaTunes that aren't actually for sale. Either we haven't yet obtained a DPD license for the song, or the artist hasn't granted us the Master Use Rights. We can still play short clips for educational purposes under Fair Use (as acaTunes serves both as a commerce site and as a growing Archive of a cappella information), but we'll never sell a track for which we do not have permission.
| | somebody finally did this | Fri October 27th, 2006 |
| |
...so I started selling CDs over the Internet almost exactly nine years ago, with my company Virtual Voices. My very first client was Sean Altman, and our very first sale was a copy of his album seanDEMOnium, the order placed on Halloween Day, 1997.
It's already hard to remember (or to imagine if you've been active online less than a decade), that back in those days a band had to actively teach its audience that there was something called The Internet, and that it had your web site on it.
It also took a fair amount of effort, tech savvy, and money to start an online business, set up a web site with a shopping cart, convince a bank to give you a merchant account etc etc, all in order to sell CDs online. I was singing with Five O'Clock Shadow at the time, and once I realized how expensive it would be to set up online sales for FOCS, I decided to open it up to other groups as well, and Virtual Voices was born.
Fast-forward nine years and the Internet is a very different place. It is now easier than ever to find online content and have it delivered right to your hard drive, and many people consider CDs (and the catalogs that sell them) to be nothing more than relics of an earlier century.
The a cappella community has changed greatly in the past nine years as well. Collegiate a cappella has exploded, with high school a cappella rapidly following in its wake. Three years ago the nations first and largest high school contest series, NCHSA, was formed, and is now launching a new collegiate contest series. The advent of ever-cheaper, ever-easier digital recording equipment has led to hundreds of new albums being released every year.
And just a few months ago, I teamed up with Freddie Feldman and his studio VOCOMOTION to bring Virtual Voices into the 21st Century. Together we developed and launched this new site, acaTunes, a single-source for direct online downloads of a cappella music.
Welcome. Join us as we take conventional wisdom and give it a good shaking up. Get ready to rethink the way you think about a cappella.
|
|
Freddie's acaTunes Blog
Freddie Feldman is the other Co-Founder of acaTunes. Freddie likes to talk about the music industry and ways that artists can better promote themselves online.
You can contact Freddie using our Contact Form. |
| |
| Big Changes In "The Charts" | Thu January 11th, 2007 |
| Something very important in the world of digital music distribution happened on January 1st, and most musicians don't even know about it. The UK Top 40 Charts changed the rules regarding what constitutes a "sale." Now all digital single sales are counted, even if there is no CD version of the track. This isn't one of those times when a rule changes, but no artist actually makes it matter. It matters and the UK band Koopa are the pioneers.
Koopa is an unsigned rock band out of Essex UK, and they're on course to enter the UK Top 40 charts, this week, with a single that exists in digital form only. This band has a huge following, probably garnered from their almost 500 gigs they've played in the past three years. Now, even an indie band can get recognized for their sales achievements, even if they don't have a "real CD."
Is this rule going to hop across the pond and affect the US Top 40 charts? Who knows. But bands like Koopa will definitely help. Of course, you still can't submit something for Grammy's consideration unless it's on an actual CD, but that may change in the future as well.
What does this mean for a cappella groups? It just goes to reinforce what I've been saying about the importance of good digital distribution and the lack of need for a complete album, or physical CD. You just need one good song, and get it out there. You can make waves without the help of a big record label.
| Selling a Track vs. Selling an Album | Mon January 1st, 2007 |
| Digital distribution has changed many things about the music industry and one big change is the shift in focus from albums to tracks. Now that listeners can choose which tracks they purchase, artists could be in for some real trouble. If you were just diggin' some single you heard on the radio, you used to only be able to purchase a full album in order to get it. This is where artists and record labels really used to make out like bandits. All you really needed was a hot single and you could sell 12 tracks automagically, even if 11 of them were really crap. Now, more than ever, every single track really counts. That one track will sell but the rest could lie dormant, not unlike "All You Need Is Rock N Roll" off White Lion's 1987 release Pride...but I digress. Now, by releasing 12 tracks, your sales have 1/12th the potential they used to have. One twelfth?! That's like...eleven fewer twelfths! HOLY CRAP! What do we do!? Release fewer, better, original songs! Write that down. Okay, lesson is done for the day. Well...alright, maybe there's a bit more. Let's take a closer look at that sentence and break it down: "Release" - Record a song and sell it on acaTunes. With acaTunes, you don't need to press CDs. You'll save yourself tons right there. "fewer" - No need for a million songs. Just one song will do. "better" - No filler necessary. Just good music. Seriously. "original" - Save that 9.1-cents per sale in licensing fees and write something on your own. In a world where a song sells for $1, that's a small pie to slice up. Maximize every bit. "songs" - Songs. Not albums. Songs. Not albums. Got it? There you have it. Now, don't get me wrong. I still think artists should put out albums, but I think that if you're going to put a bunch of songs into a "collection" there should be a purpose. Some continuity. Something. But unless you're releasing the next American Idiot, The Black Parade, or Dark Side of the Moon...maybe spending all that money to record, mix, master, and press an album with 12 songs on it is not the best use of your money. Focus your energies into doing something new, something hot, something...better. Always remember, no matter what you do...we at acaTunes still love you very much.
|
|